Q2) Wikipedia

Wikipedia ‘enables anyone, anywhere to collaborate, share, post, and edit knowledge content’ (Eijkman, 2010, p. 175.). This source of information resembles an online encyclopaedia that is nevertheless engaging. However, academics state that there are numerous drawbacks which categorise Wiki as not credible and trustworthy. For example, before submitting an assignment, I am always advised by my tutors and lecturers not to use Wikipedia as a reference. The disadvantages of Wikipedia include the following:

  • We are never sure if the information is true or false because of the ‘open’ process of adding and updating information;
  • The validity and expertise of its contributors is not known or acknowledged;
  • Coverage of historical events are inadequately represented while current news is given more attention;
  • Many articles do not include any independent sources which makes it difficult to check the credibility of its outside references (Denning, Horning, Parnas & Weinstein, 2005, p. 152).

The unregulated procedure of adding content without expert scrutiny and peer reviews deems Wikipedia ineligible for educational purposes, especially at university level. In addition, the growing ratification of universal collaboration of Wikipedia coincides with the mindset of Web 2.0 (Eijkman, 2010). It encourages participation and is dependent of its users. On the contrary, prior to the Web 2.0 sensation, scholars and experts were the representatives of trustworthy sources of information. No matter how convincing and enthralling Wikipedia might seem, educators will always advise us to use academic and peer-reviewed sources which guarantees us reliable, relevant and dependable information.

References:

Denning, P., Horning, J., Parnas, D., & Weinstein, L. (2005). Wikipedia risks. Communications of the ACM, 48(12), p. 152.

Eijkman, H. (2010). Academics and Wikipedia: Reframing Web 2.0 as a disruptor of traditional academic power-knowledge arrangements. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(3), 173-185.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Q2) Wikipedia

  1. Hi! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you
    using for this site? I’m getting sick and tired of WordPress because I’ve had
    issues with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives
    for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

    • Hey there! I’m using WordPress. WP is good for long articles, try Tumblr as well. Just discovered this one, Squarespace (however it is a paid platform yet offers customizability and a more professional look). All the best!

  2. Have you seen some other articles similar to this particular one?
    I would personally want to explore much more about this specific subject matter!
    We really love your main blog posts, nonetheless I really need
    a little more facts for computer safety for kids. Thanks for your insight!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s